Interrogation: has abuse been reduced by psychologists?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
"Enhanced" interrogation of detainees: do psychologists and psychiatrists participate?
After revelations of participation by psychiatrists and psychologists in interrogation of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay and Central Intelligence Agency secret detention centers, the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association adopted Position Statements absolutely prohibiting their members from participating in torture under any and all circumstances, and, to a lim...
متن کاملHas acromegaly been diagnosed earlier?
PURPOSE We investigated whether acromegaly has been diagnosed earlier at the Niigata Medical and Dental University Hospital. METHODS Patients with acromegaly (n = 81) who underwent their first transsphenoidal surgery from 2006 to 2015 were reviewed. Two groups were compared: those who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2010 (n = 35) and those who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2015 (n = 4...
متن کاملNDT theory has been updated.
Thc SEC developcd this statcment 1)1' revicwing kCI' educllional and historical documcl1ls of AOTA. A draft of this papel' was distributcd bmadly for review ancl commel1l to kel' constitucl1l groups ancl leadcrs of the Associarion, Two cycles of review were completed before the statement Ivas submitted to the Representarive Assembly in 1993. The intent of the statement is nor to delineate all p...
متن کاملFamily-Focused Substance Abuse Prevention: What Has Been Learned From Other Fields
Families are the primary institution for raising children who are the future of any society. Family socialization processes are the primary predictors of children's behavior. The importance of family risk and protective processes in the development of drug abuse and dependency is acknowledged in most empirically tested, multicausal etiological models of substance use (Ary et al., in press; Broo...
متن کاملHas the Erie Doctrine Been Repealed by Congress?
The enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) is a congressional pronouncement implying that the Erie Doctrine is seriously erroneous. In broad terms, CAFA allows class actions that have been filed in state courts and that are based on state substantive law to be removed to federal court if they involve out-of-state defendants and more than five million dollars in claimed damage...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/460173a